Naturalistic fallacy

en

WikiRank.net
ver. 1.6.2

Naturalistic fallacy

Quality:

Naturalistic fallacy - ethical argument asserting that it is fallacious to explain something good reductively. Article “Naturalistic fallacy” in English Wikipedia has 44.7 points for quality (as of July 1, 2025). The article contains 24 references and 15 sections.

In this language version of Wikipedia the article has the best quality. Also, this article is the most popular in that (English) language version.

In June 2025 the article “Naturalistic fallacy” was edited by 3 authors in English Wikipedia and written by 7 authors in all languages.

Since the creation of article “Naturalistic fallacy”, its content was written by 176 registered users of English Wikipedia and edited by 560 registered Wikipedia users in all languages.

The article is cited 395 times in English Wikipedia and cited 1806 times in all languages.

The highest Authors Interest rank from 2001:

  • Local (English): #867 in October 2001
  • Global: #1026 in October 2001

The highest popularity rank from 2008:

  • Local (English): #52678 in April 2012
  • Global: #59465 in April 2014

There are 23 language versions for this article in the WikiRank database (of the considered 55 Wikipedia language editions).

The quality and popularity assessment was based on Wikipédia dumps from July 1, 2025 (including revision history and pageviews for previous years).

The table below shows the language versions of the article with the highest quality.

Languages with the highest quality

#LanguageQuality gradeQuality score
1English (en)
Naturalistic fallacy
44.6782
2Ukrainian (uk)
Натуралістична помилка
33.1924
3Chinese (zh)
自然主義謬誤
27.7343
4German (de)
Naturalistischer Fehlschluss
26.6818
5Latin (la)
Captio naturalistica
24.9815
6Basque (eu)
Falazia naturalista
22.7398
7Catalan (ca)
Fal·làcia naturalista
22.5267
8Hebrew (he)
כשל נטורליסטי
22.419
9Japanese (ja)
自然主義的誤謬
21.8873
10Arabic (ar)
مغالطة المذهب الطبيعي
19.4185
More...

The following table shows the most popular language versions of the article.

Most popular in all the time

The most popular language versions of the article "Naturalistic fallacy" in all the time
#LanguagePopularity awardRelative popularity
1English (en)
Naturalistic fallacy
1 735 880
2German (de)
Naturalistischer Fehlschluss
454 414
3Spanish (es)
Falacia naturalista
367 482
4Japanese (ja)
自然主義的誤謬
189 845
5Italian (it)
Fallacia naturalistica
73 637
6Finnish (fi)
Naturalistinen virhepäätelmä
65 301
7French (fr)
Paralogisme naturaliste
48 490
8Hebrew (he)
כשל נטורליסטי
42 915
9Chinese (zh)
自然主義謬誤
42 296
10Dutch (nl)
Naturalistische dwaling
42 103
More...

The following table shows the language versions of the article with the highest popularity in the last month.

Most popular in June 2025

The most popular language versions of the article "Naturalistic fallacy" in June 2025
#LanguagePopularity awardRelative popularity
1English (en)
Naturalistic fallacy
5 933
2Japanese (ja)
自然主義的誤謬
1 347
3German (de)
Naturalistischer Fehlschluss
1 186
4Spanish (es)
Falacia naturalista
486
5Italian (it)
Fallacia naturalistica
341
6Korean (ko)
자연주의적 오류
269
7French (fr)
Paralogisme naturaliste
176
8Chinese (zh)
自然主義謬誤
176
9Dutch (nl)
Naturalistische dwaling
136
10Finnish (fi)
Naturalistinen virhepäätelmä
112
More...

The following table shows the language versions of the article with the highest Authors’ Interest.

The highest AI

Language versions of the article "Naturalistic fallacy" with the highest Authors Interest (number of authors). Only registered Wikipedia users were taken into account.
#LanguageAI awardRelative AI
1English (en)
Naturalistic fallacy
176
2German (de)
Naturalistischer Fehlschluss
83
3Spanish (es)
Falacia naturalista
39
4Japanese (ja)
自然主義的誤謬
38
5Italian (it)
Fallacia naturalistica
36
6French (fr)
Paralogisme naturaliste
31
7Hebrew (he)
כשל נטורליסטי
24
8Swedish (sv)
Det naturalistiska misstaget
20
9Norwegian (no)
Den naturalistiske feilslutning
16
10Danish (da)
Den naturalistiske fejl
14
More...

The following table shows the language versions of the article with the highest Authors’ Interest in the last month.

The highest AI in June 2025

Language versions of the article "Naturalistic fallacy" with the highest AI in June 2025
#LanguageAI awardRelative AI
1English (en)
Naturalistic fallacy
3
2Japanese (ja)
自然主義的誤謬
3
3Korean (ko)
자연주의적 오류
1
4Arabic (ar)
مغالطة المذهب الطبيعي
0
5Catalan (ca)
Fal·làcia naturalista
0
6Czech (cs)
Naturalistický omyl
0
7Danish (da)
Den naturalistiske fejl
0
8German (de)
Naturalistischer Fehlschluss
0
9Esperanto (eo)
Naturisma misrezono
0
10Spanish (es)
Falacia naturalista
0
More...

The following table shows the language versions of the article with the highest number of citations.

The highest CI

Language versions of the article "Naturalistic fallacy" with the highest Citation Index (CI)
#LanguageCI awardRelative CI
1English (en)
Naturalistic fallacy
395
2Hebrew (he)
כשל נטורליסטי
270
3Danish (da)
Den naturalistiske fejl
211
4Arabic (ar)
مغالطة المذهب الطبيعي
201
5Ukrainian (uk)
Натуралістична помилка
173
6Persian (fa)
مغالطه طبیعت‌گرایانه
90
7Spanish (es)
Falacia naturalista
88
8French (fr)
Paralogisme naturaliste
79
9Japanese (ja)
自然主義的誤謬
67
10German (de)
Naturalistischer Fehlschluss
42
More...

Scores

Estimated value for Wikipedia:
English:
Global:
Popularity in June 2025:
English:
Global:
Popularity in all years:
English:
Global:
Authors in June 2025:
English:
Global:
Registered authors in all years:
English:
Global:
Citations:
English:
Global:

Quality measures

Interwikis

#LanguageValue
arArabic
مغالطة المذهب الطبيعي
caCatalan
Fal·làcia naturalista
csCzech
Naturalistický omyl
daDanish
Den naturalistiske fejl
deGerman
Naturalistischer Fehlschluss
enEnglish
Naturalistic fallacy
eoEsperanto
Naturisma misrezono
esSpanish
Falacia naturalista
euBasque
Falazia naturalista
faPersian
مغالطه طبیعت‌گرایانه
fiFinnish
Naturalistinen virhepäätelmä
frFrench
Paralogisme naturaliste
heHebrew
כשל נטורליסטי
itItalian
Fallacia naturalistica
jaJapanese
自然主義的誤謬
koKorean
자연주의적 오류
laLatin
Captio naturalistica
nlDutch
Naturalistische dwaling
noNorwegian
Den naturalistiske feilslutning
svSwedish
Det naturalistiska misstaget
trTurkish
Doğalcılık yanılgısı
ukUkrainian
Натуралістична помилка
zhChinese
自然主義謬誤

Popularity rank trends

Best Rank English:
#52678
04.2012
Global:
#59465
04.2014

AI rank trends

Best Rank English:
#867
10.2001
Global:
#1026
10.2001

Local AI rank history

Global AI rank history

Languages comparison

Important global interconnections (July 2024 – June 2025)

Wikipedia readers most often find their way to information on Naturalistic fallacy from Wikipedia articles about Is–ought problem, Appeal to nature, G. E. Moore, Social Darwinism and List of fallacies. Whereas reading the article about Naturalistic fallacy people most often go to Wikipedia articles on Is–ought problem, Appeal to nature, G. E. Moore, Metaethics and Moral realism.

Cumulative results of quality and popularity of the Wikipedia article

List of Wikipedia articles in different languages (starting with the most popular):

News from 28 January 2026

On 28 January 2026 in multilingual Wikipedia, Internet users most often read articles on the following topics: 2025–26 UEFA Champions League, Nipah virus, Doomsday Clock, UEFA Champions League, Elena Rybakina, Donald Trump, 2026 European Men's Handball Championship, killing of Alex Pretti, Kristi Noem, deaths in 2026.

In English Wikipedia the most popular articles on that day were: Ajit Pawar, Border 2, Sharad Pawar, Killing of Alex Pretti, Ilhan Omar, Sunetra Pawar, Todd Monken, Kristi Noem, Wonder Man (miniseries), Gregory Bovino.

About WikiRank

The WikiRank project is intended for automatic relative evaluation of the articles in the various language versions of Wikipedia. At the moment the service allows to compare over 44 million Wikipedia articles in 55 languages. Quality scores of articles are based on Wikipedia dumps from July, 2025. When calculating current popularity and AI of articles data from June 2025 was taken into account. For historical values of popularity and AI WikiRank used data from 2001 to 2025... More information